Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to devoteusa.com

DeVote I Onchain Voting System · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
dragonvotingsystems.com
Dragon Voting Systems, LLC
2 shared topicselections
67match
letsvotetexas.com
Let's Vote Texas | Texas Voting Information by County
2 shared topicselections
67match
letsvotehq.com
LetsVote - Secure Online Voting Platform
2 shared topicselections
67match
4dvote.com
4DVote - Secure Voting Platform
2 shared topicselections
66match
imvotingunion.com
Im Voting Union
2 shared topicselections
66match
alaskajudge.com
Alaska Judges Voting Guide
2 shared topicselections
66match
democracylive.com
Democracy Live | The Leader in Remote Voting Technologies
2 shared topicselections
65match
alexanderandjessica.com
THE VOTING FILM PROJECT
2 shared topicspolitics
65match
gopconnections.com
Republican Fundraising Systems — digital fundraising for GOP campaigns
2 shared topicspolitics
65match
noproprt.com
Home | Voting No On Prop Rt
2 shared topicspolitics
65match
democratic-voters.com
Home - Vote Democrat
2 shared topicselections
65match
democratvoterstoday.com
Home - Vote Democrat
2 shared topicselections
65match
democraticvoter.com
Home - Vote Democrat
2 shared topicselections
64match
deb4elections.com
Deborah Poulalion, Voting Rights Advocate
2 shared topicselections
64match
countryclubelection.com
Home - AssociationVoting
2 shared topicspolitics
64match
ronnikaformayor.com
Vote for Ronnika
2 shared topicselections
64match
nisha-white.com
Vote For Nisha White
2 shared topicselections
64match
normadenham.com
Norma Denham & Associates | Political Fundraising + Consulting
2 shared topicselections

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.