similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to devonmaxwell.com

Devon Maxwell – Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

denelecampbell.com

denelecampbell – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

patriciaprijatel.com

Patricia Prijatel – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Paul Sorak – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

kimkellyauthor.com

Kim Kelly – Australian Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ilirninaauthor.com

Ilir Nina – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

RE Melton – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

margaretmcgoverne.com

Margaret McGoverne – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Pat Jewell – Oh Da Joy author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Tera Kelley – Author & Editor

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Anna Haines – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

margo glynn – author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Naomi Craig – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Tess Galati – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

naomiulsted.com

Naomi Ulsted – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

terripicone.com

Terri Picone – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

nataliedykstra.com

Natalie Dykstra – Author Website

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

denisemahaneyauthor.com

Denise Mahaney – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

patriciavonjohnson.com

Patricia Von Johnson – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.