Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to devnagi.com

devnagi | 개발자 유용상 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
gojimin.com
고지민 개발 블로그
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
kimyenac.com
예나 지금이나 개발로그
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
kitekim.com
bluekite blog
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
nahyunpark.com
NAHYUN DEV
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
gmisystem.com
GMI - 100% 온라인 외주 개발 | 소스코드 100% 제공 | 착수금 20%
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
eudismuhangi.com
Eudis Muhangi | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
derkxin.com
Lee Derk Xin | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
khunbox.com
Wild Cat
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
anmonissac.com
ANMON ISSAC | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
kimkr.com
dev.kimr | Notion
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
chathuka.com
Chathuka Viduranga | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
nataferguson.com
DevNat Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
armanramdul.tech
Arman Ramdul | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
charliemeredith.com
Charlie Meredith
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
chitholian.com
Atikur Rahman Chitholian | Fullstack Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
nagialshaikh-tech.com
Eng: Nagi Alshaikh | Full-Stack Developer & UI/UX Designer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
alfrinpoulose.dev
Alfrin Poulose | Frontend Developer & Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
algotx.dev
AlgoTX - Ukasha Ahmed | Full-Stack Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.