Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to devencyclopedia.com

Dev Encyclopedia — Practical guides for software developers · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
amitray.dev
Amit Ray — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
khwandao.com
Khwandao Aitsara — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ankitmalan.tech
Ankit Singh | Senior Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
akshaybenny.com
Akshay Benny | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
etsub.com
Etsub - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
amirsolo.com
Amir Solo – Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
natejms.com
natejms - software developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
sinanaseri.com
Sina Naseri — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
arhandky.dev
Arhan Dönerkaya • Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
nateamack.com
Nate Amack, Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
amitxtech.com
Amit Chaudhary - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
nafania.com
Anya Saunders | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
simplewebtoolsbox.com
SimpleWebToolsBox — Free Tools & Practical Guides
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
ashleyhylton.com
Ashley Hylton | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
pavankulkarni.com
Pavan Kulkarni - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andrewnt.dev
Andrew Nguyen - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andrewhickey.tech
Andrew Hickey - Freelance Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
paulrajeevan.com
Paul Rajeevan – Software Developer & Technical Writer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.