Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to devedem.com

Devedem · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
evedeveloper.com
evedeveloper
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
abdesigner.net
AB Designer - Web Design & Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andywachter.com
AW Web Design & Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
deviterate.com
deviterate.com | Software development & Product design
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
developd.dev
Designd | Web Development
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
mandmwebdevelopment.com
M&M Web Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
2onwebsolutions.com
2 On Web Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
devcenz.com
Home - Devecenz Technologies LLC
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
awpspace.net
AwpSpace - Mobile Design & Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
aroziq.net
Aroziq Web Design and Development | Aroziq
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
maloneywebdevelopment.com
Maloney Web Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
andrewruddy.com
Studio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
68match
devheart.com
DevHeart - Software development best practices
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
the-aframe.com
Web Design & Development | The Aframe
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
68match
nathangabriel.com
Nathan Gabriel - Web Development and Design
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
68match
devenderkumar.com
Devender Kumar
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
khaztech.com
Web Design & Development in Canada, Toronto (GTA)
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
68match
siteopus.com
SITE OPUS | Chula Vista Website Design & Development
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.