similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to devanisingh.com

Devani Singh · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

simisinghjuneja.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Maneetpaul Singh

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andrewgoldstone.com

Andrew Goldstone

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Simon Singh | simonsingh.net

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Alexandra L. Milsom | English Professor, Romanticist, Victorianist, & Tourist

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

alanthomasphilosopher.com

ethicssocialphilosophy – Alan Thomas's blog focused on ethics and political philosophy

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

7thcrossing.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

abilitiesrisingpublishing.com

abilities rising

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

evelynreidy.com

Evelyn Reidy – Playwriting and PhD-ing

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Thoughts on Life | Musings

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Angel Daniel Matos

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

estherokonkwo.com

Esther Ifesinachi Okonkwo — Author of The Tiny Things Are Heavier | Assistant Professor

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.