Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to devanbarlow.com

Devan Barlow – Writer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
andreaskevington.com
Andrea Skevington | Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
75match
andivandenberge.com
A. VDB – Writer | Reader
2 shared topicspoetry
72match
kirarambles.com
Kira Rambles – Writer Kira Córdova
2 shared topicspoetry
71match
natalierosedyer.com
Natalie Rose Dyer – Writer, Poet, Artist
2 shared topicspoetry
71match
artists-writers.com
artists – writers
2 shared topicspoetry
71match
annachorlton.com
Anna Chorlton - Cornish writer
2 shared topicspoetry
70match
bethdefries.com
Beth DeFries – Writer, Reader, Storyteller
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
nataliekimbell.com
Natalie Kimbell – Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
69match
theashogren.com
Thea Shogren – Writer / Educator / Storyteller
2 shared topicspoetry
69match
pcevans.com
P.C. Evans – Welsh poet, writer and translator.
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
naomishuyama.com
Naomi Shuyama Gómez – writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
eudorawatson.com
Eudora Watson – Writer, Poet, Teacher, Bug Geek
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
evancostigan.com
Evan Costigan Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
ifeolatona.com
Ife Olatona – Writer & Journalist
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
patmora.com
Pat Mora – Writer, Poet, Reader
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
annapolonyi.org
Anna Polonyi – Writer and Educator
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
estherolee.com
Esther O. Lee – read, write, repeat
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
andreaspofford.com
Andrea Spofford – Writer & Editor
2 shared topicspoetry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.