similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to designingforperformance.com

Designingforperformance alternatives & similar sites

Designing for Performance by Lara Callender Hogan — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design And Html →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
designdrop.ai ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Exceptional Design Built For Performance	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aethel.digital ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Aethel Digital - Performance Web Design for Growth	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cinerahouse.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Cinéra House High-Performance Website Design & 2-Day Builds	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designing-possibilities.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Designing Possibilities \| Home	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studioelaraco.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Showit Website Designer for Creatives \| Studio Elara Co	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designwtx.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Website Design And Branding For Service Companies	United States~ en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindzmap.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Best Website Designing Company in Chennai - MindzMap	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
easydesignoptimizations.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Easy Design Optimizations \| High-Performance Contractor Web Design	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
designbyend.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Website Design & Branding for Growing Businesses \| Design by END	United Kingdom~ en	web-design-and-html Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
designwicker.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Russell Callison Design	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1webhosting.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	1WebHosting — Web Design & Book Editing for Small Businesses	en	web-design-and-html WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
activatingdesign.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Activating Design Ltd	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adammarston.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Adam Marston \| Freelance User Experience (UX) Designer in Germany	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studio-boost.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Boost, Studio for Product Design	en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hostingyork.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Website Design News and Blog for Hosting York - Hosting York	United Kingdom en	web-design-and-html MODX	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bardzic.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Freelance Product Designer - Ljubomir Bardžić	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cinderpeakdesign.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cinder Peak Design \| Websites for Restaurants	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediavolt.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Free Website Builder for Actors, Musicians, Performers \| Media Volt	United Kingdom en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.