Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to designer-michael.com

Michael Elizarraraz Product Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
eddypeng.com
Eddy Peng - Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
efrat-solomon.com
Efrat Solomon | Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
aurelienmarrast.com
Aurélien Marrast | Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
mrboyo.com
Product Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
accportfolio.com
ACC Portfolio - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
ahmedportfoliodesign.com
Ahmed Musah | UX & Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
burakerenoglu.com
Burak Erenoğlu - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
juliajoonakim.com
Julia Kim — Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
mstencel.com
Michal Stencel — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
brunofontebasso.com
Bruno Fontebasso - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
lucycilia.com
Lucy Cilia Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
alexgf.dev
Àlex GF | UI/UX & Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
tessameyer.com
Tessa Meyer - Staff Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
juliepaik.com
Julie Paik — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
lorenzoguardati.com
Lorenzo Guardati - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
abigailandersondesign.com
Abigail Anderson Designs - Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
asthaagarwal.com
Astha Agarwal | Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
terranceliu.com
Terrance Liu — UX & Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.