similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to deroock.net

Deroock alternatives & similar sites

Roberto de Roock, PhD – Researcher of learning, technology, and social justice — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
digitalpedagogyobserver.blog ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Cultivating Positive Outcomes – Educational Technology	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
appliedscholastics.org.uk ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Applied Scholastics International \| Study Technology to Overcome Any Learning Problem	GB en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
appliedscholastics.ie ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Applied Scholastics International \| Study Technology to Overcome Any Learning Problem	IE en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luisperezonline.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	The Website of Luis Perez – Insights on Inclusive Learning Technology.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academicalchemist.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Lisa Lienemann \| teacher without a classroom, ed research junkie, and fan of formative assessment	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josevilson.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	The Jose Vilson \| Educator, Author, and Sociologist	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dearbornhub.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	The Hub for Teaching and Learning Resources – At the University of Michigan – Dearborn	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jolenexus.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Journal of Learning and Educational Nexus	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctlonline.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home - CTL - Collaborative for Teaching and Learning	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aaeebl.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	AAEEBL – The Association for Authentic, Experiential, & Evidence-Based Learning	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sussexlearningnetwork.org.uk ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home - Sussex Learning Network	GB en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jmste.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
drbarbbrown.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Dr. Barbara Brown – Leading and Learning in a Digital Age	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4educational.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	4Educational -- Search for Education Resources, Courses, and Tools	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sustainable-learning.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Sustainable Learning - Bridging the gap	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baobablearning.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home - Baobab Learning Center	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csb2ecosystem.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CSB2 Ecosystem – Serving Blair, Bedford, Cambria, and Somerset Counties	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4apal.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Partnership for the Advancement of Learning \|	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.