Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to derekwinterbottom.com

Derek Winterbottom · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
angevinworld.com
Homepage Angevin World - Angevin World
2 shared topicshistory
63match
globalriseofsoy.com
Home | Rachel Steely
2 shared topicshistory
62match
alexwellerstein.net
Alex Wellerstein – Historian, Author, Programmer, Professor
2 shared topicshistory
62match
eugenewindchy.com
Home - Eugene Windchy
2 shared topicshistory
62match
glenarbor.com
Glen Arbor Sun – Here to enlighten you
2 shared topicshistory
62match
restricteddata.net
Restricted Data – Alex Wellerstein
2 shared topicshistory
62match
thearchiverevisited.com
The Archive Revisited – Black Feminist Internationalism and Eurasian Knowledge Production
2 shared topicshistory
62match
peihomechildren.com
PEI Home Children
2 shared topicshistory
62match
simonreeshistory.com
Simon Rees History
2 shared topicshistory
61match
chaoticinheritance.com
Chaotic Inheritance
2 shared topicshistory
61match
pedroaregalado.com
Pedro A. Regalado – Stanford University
2 shared topicshistory
61match
andyschocket.net
Andy Schocket – historian, creative writer, union member
2 shared topicshistory
61match
anecdotesfromantiquity.com
Anecdotes from Antiquity
2 shared topicshistory
61match
nadaofthesun.com
Nada of the Sun
2 shared topicshistory
61match
arthurpresidency.com
Chester A. Arthur: A Reclaimed Presidency | O.H. Preis
2 shared topicshistory
61match
deniseyho.com
Denise Y. Ho – Historian | Teacher | Writer
2 shared topicshistory
61match
estopinal.com
Stephen Estopinal - Home
2 shared topicshistory
61match
kilotau.com
kilotau.com | kilotau.com - reading, thinking, and learning
2 shared topicshistory

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.