Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to derekux.com

Derek Stein - UX Researcher & Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
aniamacksey.com
Ania Macksey - UX Researcher & Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
aaron-s-hall.com
Private: about | Aaron Hall - UX Researcher & Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
renmartindoike.com
Ren Martin-Doike - UX Research & Design
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
andersaxelwallace.com
Anders Axel Wallace | UX Researcher + Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
naningutoyo.com
naningutoyo | UX Research & Design
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
andreawilliamsdesign.com
UX Researcher | Andrea Williams Design
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
bettihatvani.com
Betti Hatvani • UX Designer / Researcher
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
amymalinowski.com
Amy Malinowski // UX Designer and Researcher
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
kimtuen.com
kimtuen - UX designer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
devmaulux.com
Devin Mauldin - UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
n8tanner.com
Nate Tanner | UX Researcher
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
angiedelgadoux.com
Angie Delgado UX Design and Research
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
des-ian.com
DES-IAN - UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
theahines.com
Thea Hines - UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
bettytroy.com
Betty Troy – User-Centered Research & Design
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
angelinechang.com
Angeline Chang - UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
artofmarkrosenblatt.org
UI / UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
aniketm.com
Aniket - UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.