Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to derekpress.com

Home - Derek Press · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
majesticbookprep.com
Home - Majestic Book Prep
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
napilipress.com
Napili Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
imaniforester.com
Home - imaniforester.com
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
christinareads.com
Home - Christina Reads
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
knopfdoubleday.com
Home - Knopf Doubleday
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
childrensboook.com
Home - Children's Book
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
chrisatkinonline.com
Home - Chris Atkin
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
bhavyapublication.com
Home - Bhavya Publication
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
andreasusanglass.com
Home - Andrea Susan Glass
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
tentwelvefour.com
Home - tentwelvefour
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
chimeraediting.com
Home - Chimera Editing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
animaldreamingpublishing.com
Home - Animal Dreaming Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
agdrpress.com
AGdR Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
european-world.com
Home - European World
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
europesparliament.com
Home - John Harper Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
howtheeuworks.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - John Harper Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
aberdeenunipress.org
Home | Aberdeen University Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
chicagoreference.com
The University of Chicago Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.