Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to derekp.com

Derek Peterson - Seattle Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
andersonmalheiro.com
Anderson - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
simidickson.com
Simi Dickson - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
aryanjathar.dev
Aryan - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
aidanmcmurray.dev
Aidan McMurray — Web Developer, Seattle WA
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
dereklamarr.com
Derek Lamarr - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
devryanchoi.com
DevRyan - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
alexanderanderson.net
Alexander Anderson - Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
derekboucher.com
Derek Boucher - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
2drupalers.com
website developer2
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
reneenortcliffe.com
Matt Patterson - Software Developer in Melbourne, Australia
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
andrius.info
Web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ammaraslam.com
Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
developercode.dev
Jorge Developercode
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
kimeyrobertson.com
Kimey Robertson - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
adamhutson.info
Adam Hutson - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
mzudevelopers.com
MZU Developers
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
nahomalemu.com
Nahom Alemu | Full-Stack Developer | Seattle
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
arjunsharma.dev
Arjun Sharma - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.