similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to derekbischoff.com

Derekbischoff alternatives & similar sites

Derek Bischoff – 1st Year Graduate Student at the University of Delaware — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cusap.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Students Against Pseudoscience – Based at the University of Cambridge	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agroecolab.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Agroecology Lab at the University of Maine	en	science Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
platosmith.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Plato L. Smith II, Ph.D. \| University Librarian at the University of Florida	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
africanclimateoxford.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	African Climate Research – University of Oxford \| Research group of Professor Richard Washington	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saralotemplio.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Sara LoTemplio, PhD – Assistant Professor at Colorado State University – EEG neuroscientist	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
syjunglab.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	SY Jung Lab \| CHA University	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathankasdin.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Kasdin \| Neuroscience PhD Candidate at Columbia University	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonkasdin.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Kasdin \| Neuroscience PhD Candidate at Columbia University	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acousticecologylab.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Acoustic Ecology Lab — Arizona State University	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abec-research.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ABEC - Aberdeen Belfast Evidence Collaboration • A scientific collaboration between the University of Aberdeen and Queen’s University Belfast	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joseacanada.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jose A. Cañada – Researcher, writer, musician. May add more identities in the future.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dreamresearch.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Quantitative Study of Dreams - U.C. Santa Cruz	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctemps.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Center for Transformative Environmental Monitoring Programs \| Oregon State University	US~ en	science Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luslab.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	NanoFab Laboratory @ Long Island University	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sapienlabs.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sapien Labs \| Neuroscience \| Human Brain Diversity	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denisnoble.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Denis Noble – The Music of Life	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sarahsweigart.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sarah Sweigart – Taking on the world, one step at a time	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
downeastinstitute.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Welcome to Downeast Institute. Marine Science Field Station for the University of Maine at Machias. - Downeast Institute	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.