similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to derdtpler.de

Derdtpler alternatives & similar sites

Bernhard Werner Desktop-Publishing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
agm-publishing.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	AGM Publishing	de	publishing-industry Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
europapier.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Europapier Deutschland - Europapier Publishing	DE de	publishing-industry Pimcore Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7x-publishing.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	7X publishing / björn stengel	de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deckermedia-group.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	deckermedia \| Professional Publishing	DE de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deckermedia.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	deckermedia \| Professional Publishing	DE de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
desecurity.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	qmedia GmbH \| Digital Publishing House	DE de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moliri-seminare.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	MOLIRI. Heike Burch – Publishing-Kompetenz -	de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casmos-media.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CASMOS Media – Financial Content, Corporate Publishing & Verlag	DE de	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
einsenden.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	GRIN Selfpublishing: Veröffentliche dein Buch, akademischen Text	DE de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
derclubderselfpublisher.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Der Club der Selfpublisher \|	DE de	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
storyvents.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Literaturagentur & Redneragentur \| Corporate Publishing & Book Concepts	de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datahaus-publishing.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Datahaus Publishing \| databased publishing – Automatisierte Printprodukte mit Databased Publishing	DE de	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
childadx.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Publisher-Partner finden \| Zertifizierter Publisher-Partner – Google	de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
calltrust.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CALLtrust - Partner der Verlagshäuser - CALLtrust	DE de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
globalepropaganda.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	global:epropaganda – Dienstleistungen für Autoren, Selfpublisher und Verlage	DE de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
herdlein.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Beatrix und Richard Herdlein	de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ilvbooks.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Sie träumen davon, publizierter Schriftsteller zu werden?	de	publishing-industry Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gchristoph.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	GC EDITORIAL SERVICES & MEDIA DESIGN: We create your publications across every media	DE de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.