Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to deprived.dev

We are the DEPRIVED DEVS · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
devhousegames.com
The Devhouse Agency
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
devhousegamedev.com
The Devhouse Agency
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
devhouseagency.com
The Devhouse Agency
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
eterspire.dev
Eterspire Developer Blog
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
deviloperdru.com
Drucifer the Deviloper
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
theastronauts.com
The Astronauts – We are the spacefaring types
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
0xagents.ai
0xAgents | The Arena
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
retro-work.com
Retro Works - Arcade Game Development Service
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
thebreakisover.com
The Break Is Over - Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
skywarddigital.co.uk 🇬🇧
Game Development - Skyward Digital
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
achrafghazouani.tech
Achraf Ghazouani - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
devflynn.com
Flynn — Game Developer & Engine Architect
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
ethgames.dev
ETH Game Dev Club
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
nakshisoft.com
NakshiSoft - Innovative Game Development Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
arcticarcade.net
ArcticArcade – Independent Game Developers
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
bhopalee.com
Expert Game Development Company | Casual Games | Complex Projects | Bhopalee
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
goldenbugstudios.com
Golden Bug | Game Development Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
sinankaratas.com
Sinan Karataş | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.