Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to deplaybook.com

DePlaybook — The Action-First Design Reference · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
maepeakdesign.com
Mae Peak Design — The Art of Curated Narrative
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
bednark.com
Bednark — Design + Production Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
bednarkinc.com
Bednark — Design + Production Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
relajaelcoco.com
Relajaelcoco — Design for the Brave
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
terishim.com
Teri Shim — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
paulpapedesigns.com
Paul Pape Designs — The Secret Weapon
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
terrenceokafor.com
Terrence Okafor — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
alexhurstdesign.com
Alex Hurst Design
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
patrickrodrigues.com
Patrick Rodrigues — Experience & Interaction Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
allysall.com
Allison Sall — Product Design
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
iconoclastdesignco.com
Iconoclast Design Co.
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
gevstudio.com
GĒV Studio — Make the Process Matter | Design & Production
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
nabilbenhadi.com
Nabil Benhadi — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
pearljain.com
Pearl Jain — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
simranv.com
Simran Verma — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
akshayverma.net
Akshay Verma — Innovation and digital product design
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
ashishdesignsthings.com
Ashish Yadav — Lead Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
unailg.com
Unai Laguarta — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.