Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to denvaar.dev

Writing | denvaar's Site · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
abiram.me
abiramen's site
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
devlearnops.com
Blog | DevLearnOps
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
designisrefactoring.com
Design Is Refactoring | Writing is Rewriting, Desiging is Refactoring
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
cholick.com
Cholick.com - Matt Cholick's Site
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
paulpfaff.com
Paul's Blogging Site
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
beyondwritingcode.com
Beyond Writing Code - Human Skills for Developers
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
developerleaf.com
Beyond Writing Code - Human Skills for Developers
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
nacnez.com
Starting Point
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
argouml.org
ArgoUML Resources Site | ArgoUML
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
devexps.com
DevExps | DevExps
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
devjeremyt.com
Home | DevJeremyT
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
dev-answers.com
Home | Dev Answers
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
pasteworld.com
PasteWorld - Just Another Pastes Site
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
devgathering.com
Home | Dev Gathering
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
alexperry.dev
Alex Perry | Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
deviniarczuk.com
About me! | deviniarczuk
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
repells.com
MrScientist » Engineering | Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
christandiono.com
Chris Tandiono's web site
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.