Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to denavdl.com

Dena VDL - Full Stack Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
aaronlindsay.dev
Aaron Lindsay | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
agingdeveloper.net
The Aging Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
developersam.com
Developer Sam
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
developer20.com
Developer 2.0
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
the-fluent-developer.com
The Fluent Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
developergene.com
Developer Gene
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
devtechblogs.com
A blog for Developers
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alexperry.dev
Alex Perry | Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
developerscodex.com
Home - DevelopersCodex
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
developersoapbox.com
Developer Soapbox
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
developeronchain.com
Developer on Chain
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ikennaporter.com
Ikenna Porter | Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
abbymitchell.dev
Abby Mitchell - Developer Advocate
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
dev-anony.dev
Developer Anonymous
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
devneps.com
Developer Tutorials
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
developerschallenges.com
Developer's Challenges
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
paul-blake.com
Paul Blake - Developer & Writer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
thatdeveloperdad.com
ThatDeveloperDad - Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.