Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to demosjournal.com

demos journal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
gogibear.com
gogibear | Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
destolfe.com
de Stolfe Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
texasbookjournal.com
Texas Book Journal - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
nabilal.com
The Bee Family's Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
archetypemag.com
Home | Archetype: A Literary Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
pekkavahvanen.com
Pekka Vahvanen | Journalist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
nabokovonline.com
Nabokov Online Journal - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
averyenthusiasticjournaler.com
A Very Enthusiastic Journaler
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
angel-auyeung.com
Angel Au-Yeung - Journalist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
aniahull.com
Ania Hull | Writer | Journalist | Editor
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
desireemiddleton.com
A Writer's Journey
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
adventuresinguidedjournaling.com
Adventures in Guided Journaling
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
illuminatejournal.com
ILLUMINATE JOURNAL - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
alexanderstille.net
Alexander Stille - Writer and Journalist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
mandeliterary.com
Mande – | A journal of bipolar talent
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
annamerlan.net
Anna Merlan – Journalist & Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
kimondegreef.com
Kimon de Greef – Freelance journalist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
sinjins.com
Sinjin's, a Literary Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.