similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to demosjarco.dev

DemosJarco Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

amjadprasetyo.com

Amjad Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Azaz | Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Nima's Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

bhattaraiachyut.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Albert's Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Ahmed Soltan Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Siyam | Portfolio Hero

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Aryoks - Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

charlesfaso.com

Charles Faso Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Andrés Azpúrua | Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

chidubemchukwu.com

Chidubem Chukwu's Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

bhuvanbobba.com

Bhuvan Bobba | Portfolio & Blog

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Natanael - MyPortfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

anisha-manohar-pandya.com

anisha@sec: ~/portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Ethan Duval | Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Anjali Kok - Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.