Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to demalone.com

Home | D.E. Malone Romance Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
fayeavalon.com
Home | Faye Avalon Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
75match
djminshall.com
Romance Author | D. J. Minshall
1 shared topicsromance
74match
nicolecubba.com
Home | Nicole Cubba, Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
74match
cmsteele.com
Romance Author | CM STEELE
1 shared topicsromance
74match
ariahardingauthor.com
Aria Harding | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
74match
piperhalebooks.com
Piper Hale | Contemporary Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
74match
bentleymays.com
Bentley Mays Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
74match
dlgallieauthor.com
DL Gallie | Spicy Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
73match
abrapressler.com
Abra Pressler | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
73match
ariawyatt.com
Aria Wyatt, Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
73match
beverlypreston.com
Beverly Preston | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
73match
rjgrovesauthor.com
R.J. Groves — Romance Author - Home
1 shared topicsromance
73match
ariannajames.com
Arianna James, Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
73match
annroth.net
Contemporary Romance Author Ann Roth
1 shared topicsromance
73match
nicolettedane.com
Nicolette Dane | Lesbian Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
arialavey.com
Aria LaVey | Gothic Vampire Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
nicole-dawn.com
Nicole Dawn - Fantasy Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
71match
nevapostauthor.com
Paranormal Romance | Neva Post Author
1 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.