Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to defensibleapp.com

Defensible Overall Fire Risk Rankings · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
defensiblespacescore.com
Defensible Space Score | Wildfire Risk Made Clear
1 shared topicsdisasters
65match
defensibleedgelabs.com
Defensible Edge™ — Wildfire Mitigation Platform for Communities
1 shared topicsdisasters
65match
burnscout.com
BurnScout - Wildfire Risk Intelligence
1 shared topicsdisasters
65match
fireready.ai
FireReady — Free Wildfire Risk Assessment
1 shared topicsdisasters
64match
2mcfire.com
Your Partner in Wildfire Risk Analysis - 2MCFire Inc.
1 shared topicsdisasters
64match
defeatfire.com
Defeat Fire
1 shared topicsdisasters
64match
firerisk.app
Fire Risk - Understand and Prepare for Wildfire Risks | Fire Risk
1 shared topicsdisasters
64match
firerecoverynetwork.org
Fire Recovery Network
1 shared topicsdisasters
64match
memorialfire89.com
Memorial Fire Company 89
1 shared topicsdisasters
63match
dealfireco.com
Deal Fire Company - Deal, NJ
1 shared topicsdisasters
63match
firehorn.com
The Fire Horn
1 shared topicsdisasters
63match
rooseveltfd.com
Unavailable - Fire Department
1 shared topicsdisasters
63match
firelinedefense.com
Wildfire Protection Service | Fireline Defense | United States
1 shared topicsdisasters
63match
orwigsburgfire.com
Orwigbsurg Fire Department
1 shared topicsdisasters
63match
rollaruralfire.com
Rolla Rural Fire
1 shared topicsdisasters
63match
albertafirebans.com
Alberta Fire Bans
1 shared topicsdisasters
63match
firerebuild.com
Palisades Fire Investigation - Fire Rebuild
1 shared topicsdisasters
63match
rondafire.com
RONDA FIRE & RESCUE
1 shared topicsdisasters

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.