Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to defectivemaker.com

defectivemaker · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
calculuss.com
Calculus
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
dipanjansaha.com
Dipanjan Saha
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
evanassmus.dev
Evan Assmus
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
mohamedbakeralawieh.com
Mohamed Baker Alawieh
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
anjieyang.com
👋 Hello there, I’m Anjie! - Anjie’s Homepage
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
calvinkarpenko.com
About Me - Calvin Karpenko
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
dimademler.com
About Me - Dima Demler’s Site
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
gaoluyu.com
Luyu Gao
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
heitorgomes.com
Heitor Murilo Gomes - Machine Learning for Data Streams
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
jacobastern.com
About - Jacob Stern’s Personal Website
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
reyescruz.com
Gisela Reyes-Cruz - About Me
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
riadibadulla.com
About me - Riad Ibadulla
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
riakalluri.com
Pratyusha Ria Kalluri
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
m7directive.com
M7 Directive
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
commacollectivehq.com
Comma Collective
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
kollective-agency.com
Kollective Agency
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
machinacollective.com
Machina Collective
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
kristakorinke.com
Krista Korinke
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.