similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to deepcommons.org

Deepcommons alternatives & similar sites

Deep Commons – critical political economy | arts | advocacy — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
digitalcommons.coop ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Digital Commons Co-Operative	en	environment Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
svshen.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Shiran Victoria Shen – political scientist + environmental engineer advancing research for a more sustainable future	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hannahemple.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Hannah Emple – Research and writing on social and economic equity	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luisfourzan.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	LUIS FOURZAN – Lawyer and sustainability advocate	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nanochlor.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Critical Role of Water Chlorination	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
planetcritical.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Planet: Critical	en	environment Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
syclimateaction.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Singapore Youth for Climate Action – Empowering youth in Singapore to advocate for equitable climate policies	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naoko-art.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Naoko Otsuka Art Gallery \| Emvironmental and Ecological Artist	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joannagubman.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Joanna Gubman – Urbanist advocate. Former judge. Clean energy & transportation expert.	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
journalistsgoorganic.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Journalists Go Organic – Advocating Eco-Friendliness	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csd-i.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Climate Action Training & Practical Tools for Communities \| CSDi	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lukekitchel.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Luke Kitchel \| Environmental & Animal Advocacy, Community Organizing & Outreach	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csepractice.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	CSEP — Center for Strategic Ecological Practices	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
planetearthmatters.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Planet Earth Matters - Earth, Energy, Environment, Engineering, Economics	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrewkelly.com.au ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Andrew Kelly \| Author and environmental activist / Writing and advocating	AU en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7commons.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	7Commons - Field Studies & Commons Research Platform	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alphaville.net.au ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ALPHAVILLE – Arts, Film, Science, Community, Environment	AU en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
farhana-sultana.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Farhana Sultana	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.