similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to declan-spec.org

Declan Spec alternatives & similar sites

GitHub - philsquared/declan: A, data-only, DEClarative LANguage. Think statically typed JSON, with a nicer syntax, and algebraic data types. · GitHub — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
fuji-nakahara.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	fuji-nakahara (Fuji Nakahara) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iaxoma.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	staticmesa (J K Rodgers) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4dpiecharts.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	4D Pie Charts \| Scientific computing, data viz and general geekery, with examples in R and MATLAB.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
addonscript.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	GitHub - Anvilcraft/addonscript-java: Moved to https://data.tilera.xyz/git/Anvilcraft/addonscript-java · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
easylanguageprogramming.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	EasyLanguage Programmer \| Multicharts \| Tradestation	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
easylanguageprogramming.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	EasyLanguage Programmer \| Multicharts \| Tradestation	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abc-tradinggroup.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	EasyLanguage Programmer \| Multicharts \| Tradestation	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abctradinggroup.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	EasyLanguage Programmer \| Multicharts \| Tradestation	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devdiaries.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Dev-diary - Programming tips, tricks, and news	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abnermoralesr.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	abnermoralesr (Abner Morales) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ichorio.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Jezza (Jezza) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cilyan.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Think & Code \| A blog about thinking and coding	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
henrysantosj.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	henrysaantos (Henry Santos) · GitHub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rodriados.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	rodriados (Rodrigo Siqueira) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dreaminforce.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	DreamInForce.com - Moving things with the Force	en	programming-languages WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helyx.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Helyx.org - Code :: Run :: Learn & Iterate	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agilecoding.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	AgileCoding.io - connecting agile project management with coding and all it takes around it	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roganartu.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Adventures in Reliability · Tony Lykke	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.