Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to decimator.com

Decimator Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
gasvsmilk.com
The Bigger Design
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
beeboxdesigns.com
Beebox Designs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
aaronmonson.com
Home | A.M. Design
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
henrypauletdesign.com
Henry Paulet Design
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
researchdesignlab.com
Research Design Lab
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
shielddigitaldesign.com
Shield Digital Design
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
octaplex.com
Octaplex Embedded Design
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ethanhuangdesign.com
Ethan Huang Design | Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
rewlogan.com
Product Designer | rewlogan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nytimepost.com
Design News Feature
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andrewlb.com
andrewlb | design and writing
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
anduru.com
ANDURU ⁄ Design technologist
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
calebstacy.com
Caleb Stacy — Content Design
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ishaanbose.com
Ishaan Bose | Design Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
know-cards.com
Know Cards – designswarm
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
8d-designs.com
8D Designs – I make stuff
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
diogo-lopes.com
Homepage - Diogo Lopes Designer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
bdevega.com
Borja de Vega - Product Designer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.