Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to decadejournal.com

Decade. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
academiamariac.com
Academia
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
decadesauthor.com
DECADES – A memoir of 80 years of living
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
decamot.com
The Decamot Method
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
mssiegel.com
Academic Desk
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
academicdesk.com
Academic Desk
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
burnettsbooks.com
David Burnett
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
academiabooks.com
Academia Eshop
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
lynettesjones.com
Lynette S Jones
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
sankaraafricareview.com
SankaraAfricaReview - Pan African journal of literature.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
alastairbonnett.com
Alastair Bonnett
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
bernettrarebooks.com
Bernett Rare Books Inc
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
5yearsback.com
Five Years Back
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
iainsthomas.com
Here at last, we shall be free. – The journal of Iain S. Thomas.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
machineshedmemories.com
Home | MachineShedMemories
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
openreviewquarterly.com
Open Review Quarterly
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
amorcunmasked.com
AMORC Unmasked – Exploring Four Decades of Entrapment in AMORC, a Mind Control Cult
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
daydini.com
Home | Daydini
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
cgeppinette.com
C. G. Eppinette – Author Website
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.