similar sites

Sites similar to deancycon.com

Dean Cycon | Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

D.B. Heron | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

dougjacksonauthor.com

Doug Jackson | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anniequinnwrites.com

Annie Quinn | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

alanatchison.com

Alan Atchison | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

nina-george.com

NINA GEORGE | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

denikacarothersebook.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

deanaluchia.com

Deana Luchia | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Leozuma | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

jessicafishmanauthor.com

Jessica Fishman | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

daylekinney.com

Dayle Kinney | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bunmiemenanjo.com

Bunmi Emenanjo | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

jessicatrias.com

Jessica Trias | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

inadmissibleevidence.com

Philip Friedman | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Meagan Kish | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rosemaryerickson.com

Rosemary J Erickson | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rosemaryjerickson.com

Rosemary J Erickson | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

nohigherlaw.com

Philip Friedman | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Roxi Harms | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.