similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to dcon24.com

Dcon24 alternatives & similar sites

Dittmann Consulting GmbH – SAP IT-Beratung und Anwendungsentwicklung — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
kalender-software.de ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	tiart Software- und Anwendungsentwicklung - HOME	DE de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maconus.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	MACONUS IT Beratung & Softwareentwicklung	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
imagine-worlds.de ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Imagine Worlds IT-Beratung – Softwareentwicklung und Anforderungsmanagement	DE de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
unsix.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Beratung & Entwicklung – unsix	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incremento.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	incremento++ GmbH – Anwendungsentwicklung	DE de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
point-gmbh.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	IT-Beratung und Softwareentwicklung in Hamburg \| POINT.	de	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
devenlia.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Devenlia – Softwareentwicklung & IT-Consulting Stuttgart	DE~ de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gwdata.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	gw-data, Soft- und Hardware, Entwicklung und Service	DE de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gw-data.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	gw-data, Soft- und Hardware, Entwicklung und Service	DE de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inlinesoft.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Kommerzielle und technische Softwareentwicklung	DE de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agileentwicklung.at ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	IT-Beratung für die öffentliche Hand und Softwareentwicklung - ADVITEC	AT de	software-and-applications TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
agile-entwicklung.at ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	IT-Beratung für die öffentliche Hand und Softwareentwicklung - ADVITEC	AT de	software-and-applications TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
advitec.at ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	IT-Beratung für die öffentliche Hand und Softwareentwicklung - ADVITEC	AT de	software-and-applications TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
advisim3d.at ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	IT-Beratung für die öffentliche Hand und Softwareentwicklung - ADVITEC	AT de	software-and-applications TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
kess-consulting.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	KESS Consulting GmbH	DE de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abrauer.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Artur Brauer, IT-Beratung	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
innoge.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Software Consulting & Entwicklung mit KI \| InnoGE	DE de	software-and-applications Statamic	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
it-systems-consulting.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	ITSC IT Systems Consulting GmbH – Ihre Unterstützung bei allen Belangen der Software Entwicklung	DE de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.