Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to dcarrigg.com

David Carrigg — Technical Director & Game Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
antierstudio.com
Antier Studio — Full-Cycle Game Development Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
obiludi.com
Obiludi - Independent Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
swierkot.dev
Tommy Swierkot — Unity Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
henano.com
Henano, Indie Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
surajkarthikeyan.com
Suraj Karthikeyan — Software Engineer & Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
revolgames.com
Revol Games : Game Development Company
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
superspawn.com
Superspawn - Game Studio Directory & Developer Database
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
gamestoolkit.com
GamesToolkit — the directory of tools for game designers and developers
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
isthisandy.com
Andy Solovyov | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
moltonstudio.com
Molton Studio — Indie Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
pixelvoices.com
Pixel Voices - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
reynvert.com
reynvert - Solo Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
gamertogamedeveloper.com
Gamer To Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
andy-pang.com
Andy Pang - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
beastudio.com
Game Developer | Beastudio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
antidyne.com
Antidyne | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
gamestruction.com
Gamestruction — Indie Game Dev Tools Directory
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
oberha5li.com
Oberha5li — Independent Game Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.