Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to dberri.com

dberri.dev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
beardmikle.com
beardmikle.dev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
abdulrahmanelheyb.com
Abdulrahman Elheyb
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
dkprog.com
Daniel Koch - Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andregiannico.com
Home – Andre Giannico's Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
esorribas.com
Hi! I'm Esteban Sorribas | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
surimi.dev
Home | surimi.dev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
jakebills.com
Jake Bills | Software Developer | Jake Bills | Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
estebanborai.com
Esteban Borai | Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
jakecoffman.com
Jake Coffman Software Developer St. Louis Missouri
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
cagmz.com
Carlos Adrian Gomez
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
jackkeene.com
Jack Keene | Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
shanemander.com
Shane — Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
gazzola.dev
Az Gazzola
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
retually.com
Retually - Web dev & Opinions
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
swiftgodotbuilder.com
SwiftGodotBuilder - Declarative Godot development
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
dinosaur-dev.com
The Dinosaur Dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
jamesban.com
Jaeyoung Ban | Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
shimanti.com
Shimanti
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.