similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to datenschutztests.de

Datenschutztests alternatives & similar sites

AV-TEST | Unabhängige Tests von Antiviren- & Security-Software — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
datenschutz-tests.de ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	AV-TEST \| Unabhängige Tests von Antiviren- & Security-Software	DE de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trivter.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Inside Security GmbH	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybersecurity-eins.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Eins	DE de	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
zerobreach-strategie.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ZeroBreach - Penetrationstests, Security Beratung & Awareness Training	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zolasecure.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ZolaSecure – Trust through Security	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyberexplorer.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CyberExplorer \| Cybersecurity-Selbsttest fuer Unternehmen	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deposix-software-escrow.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Software Escrow Service: Schutz für Software und IP \| Deposix	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
aegis-sentry.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	IT-Security, Microsoft Administration & Backup Lösungen	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
coreroute.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CoreRoute – IT-Infrastruktur & Security	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codexplore.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	codexplore - Security for everyone	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
copilot-security.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Microsoft Copilot \| water IT Security GmbH	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyber8security.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - data8security	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
data8security.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - data8security	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mns-security.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Penetrationtest.de \| Management Network Security	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybersecurityleaders.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity News & Investment Insights	DE de	information-and-network-security Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
denis-it.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	DENIS \| Information Security	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zerberos.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Zerberos - Cyber Security Expertise - Zerberos	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computerservice-nf.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Security Center Nordfriesland GmbH - Startseite	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.