Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to dataunbound.co.uk

Data Unbound · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
itsalocke.com
Locke Data
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
obinjoseph.com
Obin Joseph — Data Engineer
2 shared topicsdatabases
65match
ganpatpatel.com
Ganpat Patel - Data Engineer
2 shared topicsdatabases
64match
shaydatastudio.com
Shay Data Studio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
5bulletdata.com
5-Bullet Data | Dev Bhosale | Substack
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dili-sim.com
Data | MonolixSuite Documentation
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dilisym.com
Data | MonolixSuite Documentation
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dilisymservices.com
Data | MonolixSuite Documentation
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
fragiledata.co.uk 🇬🇧
FragileData
2 shared topicsdatabases
64match
hashdata.com.br 🇧🇷
HashData
2 shared topicsdatabases
64match
esilva.io
Erich Henrique
2 shared topicsdatabases
63match
annalalik.com
Portfolio - Data Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
camcodes.dev
Cameron S | Data Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
camdoesdata.com
Cameron S | Data Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
shivamrunthala.com
Shivam Runthala
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
anobtuseangle.com
Data Science | Zach Wilkins
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
plotono.com
The All-in-One Data Pipeline and BI Platform | Plotono
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
constellation-analytics.com
Paul Chapman — Data Analyst & Analytics Engineer | Constellation Analytics
2 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.