similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to dataengineering101.com

Dataengineering101 alternatives & similar sites

Data Engineering 101 | Zero to engineering with python, sql and data warehousing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
0xeb.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Shortjump! \| Reversing engineering, programming and what not…	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curiouslyrecurringthoughts.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Curiously Recurring Thoughts – Thoughts on Software Engineering	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stackview.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	StackView - Engineering & Programming Hub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
visualizards.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Visualizards \| We write about Python, data visualisation and anything else we find interesting.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
renanmf.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Renan Moura - Software Engineering	en	programming-languages WordPress Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helberbelmiro.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Great API - Helping Java Engineers to create APIs that are easy to evolve and upgrade.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
henrypetry.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Henry Petry - A Senior Software Engineer for PHP and Python	en	programming-languages Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hendrikjoosten.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Hendrik Joosten \| Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cylindr.io ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jelle Maas — Full-stack Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dev.ms ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Software Engineering by Eugene Khabarov	en	programming-languages	robots llms ai humans	emailphone	partial · 6
4kids.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	4Kids.Dev — Data Skills for the Next Generation	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eulersolve.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Project Euler Solutions — C++, Python, Java	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
digitally-disturbed.co.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	digitally-disturbed	United Kingdom en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keithchoa.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Keith Choa - BASc. Computer Engineering @ UWaterloo	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oodlescoop.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Learn Java, C++, C Programming, Python tutorials with oodlescoop tutorials	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medmo.co.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Matt Edmonston - Freelance Software Engineer in Kent, United Kingdom	United Kingdom en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
delftstack.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Best Tutorial About Python, Javascript, C++, GIT, and more – Delft Stack	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbmanish.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Manish Raj Moriche – Software Engineer \| Developer Portfolio	Denmark~ en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.