similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to data4good.de

Data4Good alternatives & similar sites

Code for Germany ~ Stadt<entwickler /> nutzen offene Daten um ihre Stadt zu verbessern — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dataforgood.de ↗	100 match 2 shared topics	Code for Germany ~ Stadt<entwickler /> nutzen offene Daten um ihre Stadt zu verbessern	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codefor.de ↗	37 match 1 shared topics	Code for Germany	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developer-world.de ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Developer World – Events, Wissen & Community für Softwareentwickler \| DWX Developer World	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
codezumkaffee.de ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Code zum Kaffee	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
streamingequip.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Home of Streamingequip - Datenbank für Streaming Equipment	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hofstadter.io ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Hofstadter	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ceta-tortechnik.de ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Komponenten für bessere Schiebetore — Intelligente Schiebetorsysteme	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
palivorexan.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Palivorexan - Digitalisierung und smarte Unterstützung für Ihren Alltag	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
code-camp-n.de ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Deine Digitalexperten aus Nürnberg \| CodeCamp:N	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
codecampn.de ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Deine Digitalexperten aus Nürnberg \| CodeCamp:N	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
codecamp-n.de ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Deine Digitalexperten aus Nürnberg \| CodeCamp:N	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
codefieber.de ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Codefieber.de - IT-Blog	DE de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doppelgaenger.io ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Doppelgänger Tech Talk (Podcast) - Philipp Klöckner & Philipp Glöckler	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
yourfivemshop.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	YourFiveMShop - Der Marktplatz für FiveM Ressourcen	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
citywave.de ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Citywave \| The world’s leading technology for standing waves	DE de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barcode-oracle.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Landingpage * Barcode Oracle	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laffix.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	LAFFIX – Verbindung System	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codeandcreate.de ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Startseite \| Code and Create	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.