Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to dap-systems.de

DAP-Systems - DAP GmbH · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
33match
austropos.com
Austropos - PC-CASH Premium Partner
2 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
32match
kammachi-baustein.com
KAMMACHI. Kompetente SAP-Beratung. Smarte SAP-Add-Ins
2 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
32match
kammachi.com
KAMMACHI. Kompetente SAP-Beratung. Smarte SAP-Add-Ins
2 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
32match
myproof-platform.net
Index :: Glossa Group GmbH :: myproof Platform, myproof Manager, Online-Schnellcheck-System, Übersetzungsqualität testen
2 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
30match
ambiel.ai
Softwareentwicklung & KI-Beratung: Ambiel AI
3 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
29match
d-erp.com
Schweizer Business Software | ERP-System | Abacus Research AG  | Abacus Research AG
2 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
28match
d-flow-systems.com
D-Flow Systems GmbH
1 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
28match
mykost.com
Clusio Support Ticket System
1 shared tech1 shared categoryit-and-internet-support
28match
hamann-it.com
Hamann IT-Systeme Software
1 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
28match
itnerb.com
IT Nerb GmbH | IT Systemhaus seit 1990
1 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
28match
beubat.com
Start - beubat GmbH
1 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
27match
althara.com
Althara mobility systems GmbH
1 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.