similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to dankorus.com

Dankorus alternatives & similar sites

Dan Korus — The Updraft — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
anuragmahanto.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Anurag Mahanto — Thoughts	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielreiss.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Reiss — Effing the Ineffable Since 2001	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ctcstewardship.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Chaos to Clarity — Alex Probyn	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2dayceo.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The 2 Day CEO — Stop Being the Bottleneck \| Rise Up Kings	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cultureisthestrategybook.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Culture Is the Strategy — The Business Book by Dowdle & Faber	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vivianotabor.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Vivian Otabor — The Elevation Strategist	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
foothillstoastmasters.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Foothills Toastmasters — The longest running Toastmasters club in Calgary	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
requisiteleaders.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Requisite Leadership — The Complete Human-Centric Leadership Operating System	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbapub.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The MBA Pub — Where Strategy Meets the Bar	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danedwards.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dan Edwards — Creative Director	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2doctortwist.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	2 Doctors & A Twist — Just What the Doctor Ordered	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bridgettechambers.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home — Bridgette Chambers	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rickhecker.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	RickHecker.com – Musings on Leadership, Management, Web Development, and Me	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
donnywiggins.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Donny Wiggins — Personal Website	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
stansadlik.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Stan Sadlik — Senior Product Manager	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
hinesy.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Will Hines — Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aosummitgroup.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AO Summit — Join the Team	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
humanintheloopleadership.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Human in the Loop Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.