Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to danielwargh.com

Daniel Wargh · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
alexlazcano.dev
Alex Lazcano
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
rodrigobezerra.com
Rodrigo Bezerra - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mateusguimaraes.com
Mateus Guimarães
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
arjunjuneja.com
arjun juneja
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
greyblake.com
Posts | Serhii Potapov (greyblake)
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
angry-dev-thoughts.com
Angry dev thoughts - Software developers are sometimes angry
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
benjaminward.com
Benjamin Ward
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
ariannadanielle.com
Home - Arianna Danielle
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kumarnetwork.com
hozan23
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
benwc.dev
Ben Warwick-Champion
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
grumpyolddev.com
Grumpy Old Dev | Grumpy Old Dev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
dmedovich.com
Daniil Medovich
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
matecdev.com
MatecDev | Mathematics, Technology, and Software Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
agingdeveloper.net
The Aging Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kylejeske.com
Bit by Bit | A blog about coding, technology, and software development.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
pixcoders.com
Rafal Spacjer blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
robbiewadley.com
Robbie Wadley
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
pitayan.com
Pitayan Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.