similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to danielernest.com

Danielernest alternatives & similar sites

Daniel Ernest | ERP, CRM, Space & Executive Recruitment — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Human Resources →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
barker-white.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	RegTech Executive Search Recruitment – Barker White	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datacenex.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Datacenex - Data Center Recruitment and Executive Search	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datacenex.co.uk ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Datacenex - Data Center Recruitment and Executive Search	United Kingdom en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
macrorecruitment.ie ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Macro Recruitment: Leading Executive Search Experts	Ireland en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
therecruiters.co.za ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	The Recruiters - specialist financial, executive and general recruitment	South Africa en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
camining.co.za ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Africa Mining Recruitment \| Leaders in Executive Search \| CA Mining Global	South Africa en	human-resources WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
acre.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Acre \| Sustainability & ESG Recruitment & Executive Search	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
rndrecruitment.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	RND Recruitment \| Food & beverage executive search & recruitment	United Kingdom en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
bridgepointtalentsolutions.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Bridgepoint Talent Solutions \| Executive Recruiting	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sr2rec.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Socially Responsible Recruitment \| SR2 Group	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4recruiting.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Recruitment Agency North West \| Four Recruitment	United Kingdom en	human-resources Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
almrecruitment.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	ALM Recruitment	United Kingdom en	human-resources Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mrd-recruitment.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Home - MRD Recruitment	United Kingdom en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
eraindia.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Home - Executive Recruiters Association	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amfrecruitment.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	AMF Recruitment	United Kingdom en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mainstayrecruitment.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Mainstay Recruitment	United Kingdom en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3dinmotiongrp.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Executive Recruiting Firm	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corr-recruitment.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - Corr Recruitment	United Kingdom en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.