similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to danhperry.com

Danhperry alternatives & similar sites

danhperry.com – Learning to question everything! — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
herocoder.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Hero Coder – Everything coding	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
everythingpatt.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	EverythingPatt	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
everything-powershell.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - Everything-PowerShell	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
basic256.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	BASIC256 – Everybody Can Learn to Program – An open-source computer language for learning	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heavybench.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Learning PJAX - Typescript	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
databytes.io ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Databytes - Daily bytes of learning	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-fundamentals.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	IT Interview Questions and Answers & Programming Tutorials - cs-Fundamentals.com	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
essentialeffects.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Essential Effects: a book for learning effectful programming in Scala	en	programming-languages Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
everything-java.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Everthing Java \| Blog	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
everybodycodenow.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Everybody Code Now! \| Empowering the Next Generation of Leaders in Computing	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cstml.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	~/cstml.dev \| A blog like a sketchbook to keep track of my ideas, findings, and learnings. Suggestions via PRs @github or DM me on twitter.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielleskosky.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Here to Learn - Daniel Leskosky	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datacodinghub.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Data Engineering Interview Questions — PySpark, Python & SQL Practice \| DataCodingHub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielasfregola.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Daniela Sfregola – "Learn as if you were to live forever.” M. Gandhi	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
visualizards.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Visualizards \| We write about Python, data visualisation and anything else we find interesting.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
data-hacks.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Data Hacks - Learn How to Handle Data	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datamentor.io ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Datamentor: Learn to Code in R Programming and Python \|	en	programming-languages Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datadiaries.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Today I Learnt - Data Engineering Diaries	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.