Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to daezak.com

대작일보 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
45match
saerailbo.com
새라일보
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorypolitics
40match
issueweek.com
이슈위크
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorycivic-affairs
35match
issuejeonbuk.com
이슈&전북
0 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypolitical-issues-and-policy
35match
jeollailbo.com
전라일보
0 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypolitics
33match
dongbang21.com
동방의 메아리
0 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorypolitical-issues-and-policy
31match
incheontoday.com
인천투데이
0 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypolitics
29match
saeyeosu.com
새여수일보
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryelections
29match
issueus.com
이슈어스
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorypolitics
28match
saegeoje.com
새거제신문
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorycivic-affairs
28match
ganghwamiraenews.com
강화미래신문
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorycivic-affairs
27match
mediadaejeon.com
대전신문고
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorycivic-affairs
26match
nkliberty.com
March of Liberty
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorypolitics
26match
busan.com
부산일보
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorypolitics
26match
ccsimin.com
충남신문
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorycivic-affairs
26match
saemaeul-news.com
새마을 뉴스
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorypolitics
26match
busanilbo.com
부산일보
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorypolitics
25match
issuegate.com
이슈게이트
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorypolitics
25match
issuehankwon.com
이슈한권 | 세상의 구조를 읽다 - 이슈한권
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorypolitics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.