similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cyberafrin.com

Cyberafrin alternatives & similar sites

CyberAfrin — Offensive Security, DFIR, and Red Team Services — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
resecsystems.io ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Resec Systems \| Cyber Security, VAPT & Red Teaming services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dave-test.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Black Eagle Security Team — Cybersecurity Services	United States~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyber-security-services.co.uk ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Security Services	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ewanfleischmann.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Ewan Fleischmann — Offensive Security Research	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xdigi.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	0xdigi — Cybersecurity & Offensive Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyberline.uk ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Cyberline — Precision Offensive Security	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xdelta.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	0xD3lta Research — Offensive & Defensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keepernet.io ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Keepernet - Offensive Cybersecurity	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
onidef.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Onidef — Offensive Security, Compliance & Incident Response	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bc-security.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	BC Security - Offensive Security, Penetration Testing, and Training	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
anmasec.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Consultancy & Offensive Security – ANMASEC	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dauphen.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Dauphen · Offensive Security R&D	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katrinasec.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	KATRINASEC \| Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ssbugs.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	ProteQon — Offensive Security & Penetration Testing	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xpolar.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	0xpolar - Cybersecurity Research & Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daslamm.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	DasLamm // Cyber Security & IT Services	KE~ en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybercrafters.tech ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Services \| CyberCrafters	PK~ en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cybersecurity4.industries ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Services for Industry \| Secudea	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.