similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cwfnc.org

Cwfnc alternatives & similar sites

Clean Water for North Carolina – Promoting Clean Safe Water for All North Carolinians — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cswab.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CSWAB \| Citizens for Safe Water Around Badger \| Merrimac, WI	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hydrexphilanthropic.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Hydrex Philanthropic – Making Contaminated Drinking Water History	United States~ en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csaltcornell.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	CSalt Cornell - Innovating Sustainable Water Solutions	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
foothillswaternetwork.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Foothills Water Network home page	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
foreverchemicalsny.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	PFAS Forever Chemicals & Micron Clay NY — PFAS Watch NY \| Protect Central New York Water	en	environment WordPress Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maysule.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	May Sule \| Water, sanitation and hygiene; global water security; international development; Sustainable Development Goals	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hydrocitizenship.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Hydrocitizenship: Communities, Water and Shared Responsibility	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hydros2others.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Hydros2Others – Repurpose. Rehydrate. Restore.	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
forloveofwater.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	FLOW \| Public Trust Solutions for the Great Lakes	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
eaglelaketexas.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Eagle Lake Texas Association – Eagle Lake Texas Association	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
healingplacemn.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Healing Place Collaborative	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mechanicalnotes.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home - Mechanical Notes	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
environmentalsolutions.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Natural Probiotic Pond & Septic Treatments \| Environmental Solutions	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
bayouvermiliondistrict.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	BVD Homepage \| Vermilionville	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
greatlakesnow.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Homepage - Great Lakes Now	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
imperialbeachca.gov ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Imperial Beach, CA \| Official Website	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inghamcountydraincommissioner.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Ingham County Drain Commissioner	en	environment Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
earthkindbotswana.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home - EarthKind Botswana	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.