similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to culmination.org

Culmination alternatives & similar sites

Culmination.org – You are what you've become. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sanestack.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Sane Stack – The JS Fullstack to get you instantly productive.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
upulse.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	anvox \| A collection of super short text to summarize what I learn everyday.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josephma.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Joseph – Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscrunch.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	CS Crunch \| The mad ramblings of a Computer Scientist bent on world domination...	en	programming-languages Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joekirincic.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Blog – Joe Kirincic	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dementievmykola.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Check the latest news from my blog – iOS Developer Blog	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
feedbuzzar.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Feedbuzzard – Your Ultimate Source for Real-Time Updates and Insights	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joeywrites.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	joeywrites.dev - Sharing what I learn	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pitheguy.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	π the guy – These are the things I blog about	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naterose.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Home – Nate Rose	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naterose.ai ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Home – Nate Rose	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
swiftsimulations.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Swift Simulations	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nateware.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Nate Wiger \| How many beers until the bugs are fixed?	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usebrief.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	brief - It's not you, it's your prompt.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luiscustodio.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Impact + Outcome over output	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
felipekb.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Felipe's Thoughts – A small blog to my thoughts on LabVIEW software development	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hashhar.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Here Be Dragons \| Programming and social factors. A blog about programming, customising development environments and troubleshooting weird issues so that you don’t have to. There may be occasional kittens and puppers.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jordanjambazov.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Jordan Jambazov \| Software Developer. Proud dad of three kids. All opinions are wrong, but some are useful.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.