similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ctw.dev

Ctw alternatives & similar sites

travis williams — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
lucius-williams.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Lucius Williams \| Executive Sales Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joannarwilliams.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Joanna Williams Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lumaireco.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jennifer Williams — Customer Success Executive	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carowgatti.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Caroline Williams Gatti - Product + Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathantravis.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Travis — Engineering Leader & Platform Architect	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
3rdeyeleadership.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Third Eye Leadership \| Travis Green	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
navarych.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Raman Navarych - Engineering Manager & Head of Department	PL~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lukewillisleadership.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Luke Willis Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
desiwilliamson.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Desi Williamson - Motivational Speaker - Author - Entrepreneur	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saminsaju.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Samin Saju \| Strategic Leader & Product Manager	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josezarazua.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jose Zarazua — Engineering leadership \| Jose Zarazua	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnojetunde.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	John Ojetunde - Software Engineer & Technical Mentor	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avisyatesrivers.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - Avis Yates Rivers	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
famousdavis.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	William W Davis, MSPM, PMP – Positive Transformations	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designingforscale.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Designing for Scale — Scaling Great Software Engineering Teams	en	executive-leadership-and-management Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
farvisun.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Mohammad Askari — Senior Engineering Manager	IR~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joerezendes.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Joe Rezendes — Engineering leader. Founding hire. San Franciscan.	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonycheung.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Cheung - Engineering Leader \| Platform & Delivery Strategy \| Scaling High-Impact Teams	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.