similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ctrlf.net

Ctrlf alternatives & similar sites

ctrl+f — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
admeritia.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	OT-Security – admeritia GmbH	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vision-technologies.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	MODI Vision \| ✈ Access control through biometric facial recognition.	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
labforty.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Umfassende digitale und infrastrukturelle Lösungen \| LabForty	BG~ de	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
wort-kreuz.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Cookie Consent Management for EU Websites – SiteGuardian CMP	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mispa.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	mispa Technologies Home - mispa Technologies	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mispashop.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	mispa Technologies Home - mispa Technologies	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mispasoftware.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	mispa Technologies Home - mispa Technologies	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mispasoftwares.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	mispa Technologies Home - mispa Technologies	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mispasystems.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	mispa Technologies Home - mispa Technologies	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mispatech.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	mispa Technologies Home - mispa Technologies	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptsuite.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Cryptshare - Secure exchange of files and emails of any size	DE de	information-and-network-security Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
data-wallet.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Cryptshare - Secure exchange of files and emails of any size	DE de	information-and-network-security Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
demtechgroup.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	CISAT - Center for Information Security and Trust	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
darklist.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Darklist.de \| A malicious IP catcher blacklist	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
strafrecht-digital.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Weblog zu digitalen Themen aus dem Strafrecht	de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
strafrechtdigital.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Weblog zu digitalen Themen aus dem Strafrecht	de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyber-werkschutz.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Security Operations Center \| TechniData	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uni-beispielstadt.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	eXpurgate Cloud \| 99.99% Accurate Email Threat Protection	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.