similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ctreading.org

Ctreading alternatives & similar sites

Connecticut Reading Association – A State Affiliate of the International Literacy Association — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ctreadingresearch.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	CARR: Connecticut Association for Reading Research	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaie.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Home - Association for the Advancement of International Education	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
farrieru.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Education - International Association of Professional Farriers	US~ en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lucilemaertens.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Lucile Maertens – Associate Professor in International Relations	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
namaainternational.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	NAMAAI \| Global Alumni Association International	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debateandspeech.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	National Speech & Debate Association \| Connect. Support. Inspire.	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 4
dkgindiana.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	INDIANA STATE ORGANIZATION DKG SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL - IN DKG HOME	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctcharters.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Connecticut Charter Schools Association	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ctschoolcounselor.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Connecticut School Counselor Association - Home	US~ en	education phpBB	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
delhiparentsassociation.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Delhi Parents Association \| Parents' Association	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nazaninshahrokni.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dr Nazanin Shahrokni – Associate Professor of International Studies at Simon Fraser University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ncearise.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	National Catholic Educational Association	en	education DotNetNuke/DNN	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
imeservices.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	International Medical Education – Maximising Global Education Potentials	GB en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dracut-teachers.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dracut Teachers Association – We are the DTA	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aasthainternational.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Aastha International – Education & immigartion Consultant	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nedadebate.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The National Educational Debate Association \| Audience-Oriented, Collegiate, Policy and Value Debate	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
napsa.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	National Association of Pupil Services Administrators	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
decaturmusicteachers.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Decatur Music Teachers Association - Decatur Music Teachers Association	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.