similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ctdar.org

Ctdar alternatives & similar sites

Connecticut Daughters of the American Revolution, NSDAR – Connecticut Daughters of the American Revolution — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in History →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
svsar.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	The Silicon Valley Chapter of the Sons of the American Revolution,	en	history Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cuyahogafallsdar.org ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Cuyahoga Falls Chapter, NSDAR – Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio – National Society Daughters of the American Revolution	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deborahsampsondar.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Deborah Sampson Chapter, NSDAR – National Society Daughters of the American Revolution	en	history WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
aztlander.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Mike Ruggeri's Ancient Americas Magazine – THE MAGAZINE OF THE ANCIENT AMERICAS	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dearbornsar.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Fort Dearborn Chapter, Sons of the American Revolution - Fort Dearborn Chapter	en	history Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctradiohistory.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Connecticut Radio History Portal- The History of Connecticut Radio Stations	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bartlesville-sar.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Sons of the American Revolution \| Bartlesville, Oklahoma	en	history WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sar-wc.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Home - Washington Crossing Chapter - PA Society Sons of the American Revolution	en	history WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnjaycar.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home \| NSCAR	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saratoga250.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	The Battles of Saratoga \| America's Turning Point \| 250th Anniversary	en	history WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acrossamerica1776.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home Page - Across America	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cthistory.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Walter W. Woodward « Connecticut State Historian emeritus	US~ en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johncookrifleman.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	John Cook Oceana WV - - The Definitive Book on John Cook - American Revolutionary War soldier and early settler	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cthistoryforkids.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Connecticut History for Kids	en	history WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debtrevolution.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Debtors of the world, Unite!	en	history Tumblr	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 11
1historykidz.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The History Kidz – We celebrate people who have made important contributions in American history.	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johncwaugh.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	John C. Waugh – Reporting the American Civil War	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnathanseitz.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	A Study of England in the American Civil War	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.